Science and Morality, II

Science-Atheists believe not only that their ideology is superior to religion, but also that it entirely eclipses the need for a religious system.  The spiritual masses would be better off to abandon their weekly religious ceremonies in exchange for locating all instances of "studies say" and "researchers have shown" in their daily mail.  These studies often read similar to 'Our world is an illusion and we are all living in a 'vast and complex hologram' say astrophysicists.'  As a result of following the Scientific Method in their search to explain the spiritual, Science-Atheists minimize much of the human experience as chemical emissions and therefore baseless.

Happiness and spiritual bliss are due to the chemical dopamine, thus the Scientific approach to a satisfying life is to find the activities which cause dopamine to be released.  If there is a disturbing lack of spiritual satisfaction, the reason is that the dopamine emitters are malfunctioning.  If the thought of having a vagina instead of a penis releases dopamine in your brain, then Rationality is telling you to cut off your penis.  "Jesus says" and "Dopamine says" therefore are ideologically equivalent.

Search for videos on the Theory of Evolution and you will be inundated with video clips of savage predatory animals chomping up the weaker ones as to demonstrate the evolutionary process of natural selection and survival of the fittest.  Science-Atheists are oblivious to the implications of this inherently philosophical statement and its existential and moral nihilism.

Evolutionists must realize the inferiority of their philosophy to the Christian ethic.  Christians are regularly mocked by Science-Atheists for their faith in a God outside of themselves, but the Science-Atheists themselves are unaware of the blind faith that they put into the society and social order outside of their door.

Science-Atheists are overwhelming liberal, and liberals are overwhelmingly anti-gun.  But if a Science-Atheist truly believes his natural selection philosophy, he too should desire a gun as it gives him an advantage over his peers.  Thus, if a Science-Atheist desires an evolutionary advantage, he should stock up on weaponry against the intent of his own law that he supports.  Similarly, they also admit that only the successful and reproductive pass on their genes.  With this in mind, they openly and enthusiastically support homosexual relationships.

I conclude that Atheism and Science are masochistic not only to the Atheist himself, but to others as well.