The Full Circle in Education

In the early 1900's, American citizens began standing against child labor in a large scale moral crusade.  "Children are not to be manipulated for profits."  There may have been other reasons—children were most likely overrunning professions which late teenagers and early twenties persons should begin their career with.  However, the main reaction was that of moral outrage in forcing children to heavy hour labor.

So as a result, the children were put into compulsory education—and so they say "our public education system will be the best in the world!"  Well, it probably was for a time.  Children were put in quality schools to be taught the newest fields.  The children needed to know the most cutting-edge forms of logic, and so Algebra became compulsory in order to lead into Trigonometry and Calculus.  The children are taught of the social disorder of the 1960's and of the fantastic "progress" since then.

Then, they return to the outside world and see a society which does not need Calculus, and which does not need "progress" and all of its fruits.  They see that society needs ordinary trades!

So the children now go through school in a trance knowing that their studies become irrelevant at graduation, and so return home unfulfilled mid-afternoon to finish monotonous but compulsory schoolwork—for nothing other than the nod of their teacher and a letter grade.  And at days end, they play Minecraft—the most ironic of phenomena, as the game simulates the same skills and trades that the children were just a few generations ago shoo-ed away from!

The cycle has come full circle I believe.  The children now dream of the days when their work actually meant something.  They dream of building houses, designing farms to yield crops, and mining in the caverns for valuable ores.  They dream of defending their homes from mutant monsters and exploring untouched worlds.  The same activities that industry was invented to destroy are the ones the deep subconscious of the children now yearns for.

Science and Morality, II

Science-Atheists believe not only that their ideology is superior to religion, but also that it entirely eclipses the need for a religious system.  The spiritual masses would be better off to abandon their weekly religious ceremonies in exchange for locating all instances of "studies say" and "researchers have shown" in their daily mail.  These studies often read similar to 'Our world is an illusion and we are all living in a 'vast and complex hologram' say astrophysicists.'  As a result of following the Scientific Method in their search to explain the spiritual, Science-Atheists minimize much of the human experience as chemical emissions and therefore baseless.

Happiness and spiritual bliss are due to the chemical dopamine, thus the Scientific approach to a satisfying life is to find the activities which cause dopamine to be released.  If there is a disturbing lack of spiritual satisfaction, the reason is that the dopamine emitters are malfunctioning.  If the thought of having a vagina instead of a penis releases dopamine in your brain, then Rationality is telling you to cut off your penis.  "Jesus says" and "Dopamine says" therefore are ideologically equivalent.

Search for videos on the Theory of Evolution and you will be inundated with video clips of savage predatory animals chomping up the weaker ones as to demonstrate the evolutionary process of natural selection and survival of the fittest.  Science-Atheists are oblivious to the implications of this inherently philosophical statement and its existential and moral nihilism.

Evolutionists must realize the inferiority of their philosophy to the Christian ethic.  Christians are regularly mocked by Science-Atheists for their faith in a God outside of themselves, but the Science-Atheists themselves are unaware of the blind faith that they put into the society and social order outside of their door.

Science-Atheists are overwhelming liberal, and liberals are overwhelmingly anti-gun.  But if a Science-Atheist truly believes his natural selection philosophy, he too should desire a gun as it gives him an advantage over his peers.  Thus, if a Science-Atheist desires an evolutionary advantage, he should stock up on weaponry against the intent of his own law that he supports.  Similarly, they also admit that only the successful and reproductive pass on their genes.  With this in mind, they openly and enthusiastically support homosexual relationships.

I conclude that Atheism and Science are masochistic not only to the Atheist himself, but to others as well.